Re: [GIT RFC PULL] RCU changes for 2.6.35

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat May 08 2010 - 12:10:25 EST



* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:34:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, Ingo,
> > >
> > > Here is the first installment of RCU changes for 2.6.35. These commits
> > > are based on top of the rcu/urgent set sent yesterday. If you would rather
> > > rcu/urgent be merged into tip/core/rcu and then this set based on top of
> > > that, or some other arrangement, please let me know.
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git rcu/next
> >
> > FYI, it doesnt build on x86 allyesconfig:
> >
> > In file included from kernel/rcutree.c:1961:
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: In function ?rcu_needs_cpu?:
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:1066: error: invalid type argument of ?->? (have ?struct rcu_dynticks?)
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:1067: error: invalid type argument of ?->? (have ?struct rcu_dynticks?)
>
> <red face>
>
> I forgot to move CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ from my development tests to my
> regression tests. I have done so now. I have also added allyesconfig
> to my compile tests, which I should have done long ago.
>
> I am testing the fix, and will rebase the stack onto 2.6.34-rc7 when it
> comes out.

Cool, thanks Paul!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/