Re: [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from voidfunction()'s

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:58 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Churn is *not* motivated just
> >> for "consistency" unless it improves readability.
> > Consistency improves readability.
> As a general rule, sure.
> For any specific instance it is a big "it
> depends".

In these specific instances, in my opinion it does.
Your assertion is simply your opinion.
In the end, neither opinion matters much.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/