Re: [stable] [PATCH] KEYS: Return more accurate error codes

[Greg KH]

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:51:43AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2010, David Howells wrote:
> 
> > From: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > We were using the wrong variable here so the error codes weren't being returned
> > properly.  The original code returns -ENOKEY.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Queued for Linus -- is also likely a -stable candidate.

If so, please just put a:
	Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
to the signed-off-by area of the patch.  That way I automatically get
notified when it goes into Linus's tree, and I don't have to go dig and
try to match up a random email reference like this one with the actual
patch in Linus's tree...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/