Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:35:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Then that's an application bug right there, isn't it?
> > > 
> > > If should have listened to the window server telling its clients it was
> > > going to go away. Drawing after you get that is your own damn fault ;-)
> > 
> > How long do you wait for applications to respond that they've stopped 
> > drawing? What if the application is heavily in swap at the time?
> 
> Since we're talking about a purely idle driven power saving, we wait
> until the cpu is idle.

If that's what you're aiming for then you don't need to block 
applications on hardware access because they should all already have 
idled themselves.

> Note that it doesn't need to broadcast this, it could opt to reply with
> that message on the first drawing attempt after it goes away and block
> on the second.

That's more interesting, but you're changing semantics quite heavily at 
this point.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/