Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> How so, event happens on hardware level, IRQ gets raised, CPU wakes up,
> handler gets run, handler generates a task wakeup, runqueue isn't empty,
> we run stuff.

If you're using idle-based suspend without any forced idling or blocking 
of applications then you don't lose wakeups. People keep conflating 
separate issues.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/