Re: [PATCH -V13 0/11] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls

From: Aneesh Kumar K. V
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 02:08:58 EST


On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:43:28 +1000, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:44:06PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The below set of patches implement open by handle support using exportfs
> > operations. This allows user space application to map a file name to file
> > handle and later open the file using handle. This should be usable
> > for userspace NFS [1] and 9P server [2]. XFS already support this with the ioctls
> > XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE and XFS_IOC_OPEN_BY_HANDLE.
> .....
> > Example program: (x86_32). (x86_64 would need a different syscall number)
>
> [snip test program]
>
> Just a thought - can you write a set of tests using this (or
> similar) test program and integrate them into xfstests?
>
> That will help ensure correctness when implementing the API in other
> filesystems (e.g. XFS ;), as well as provide some level of assurance
> that we'll notice when we break the code...
>

Will do. I also have test that test for different open flags with
open_by_handle_at. Will add those tests also.

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/