Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Tony Luck wrote:
> 
> At the point of dereference it looks like we were trying
> to load a 4-byte data object from offset 552 into the
> "struct module *" that wa returned by load_module().

Sounds like 'mod->num_ctors' loaded by do_mod_ctors(). It's a 4-byte field 
in roughly that area.

What does a NaT consumption fault mean, and does it give the invalid 
address it was loaded off? In the successful path of "load_module()", we 
will have dereferenced the "mod" pointer we return just before, so I 
wonder if there's some error case that incorrectly returns a positive 
errno instead of a negative one, and causes us to miss the "IS_ERR()" 
check or something.

There's a couple of checking routines in module.c that do not return a 
negative error, but instead return 0/1. The one I looked at was converted 
into a negative error, but there are several cases of

	if (err)
		return ERR_PTR(err)

and if something does that on a 0/1 value, it will return a bogus pointer.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/