[no subject]

From: Mike Gilks
Date: Sat Jun 05 2010 - 07:35:19 EST

Next message: Mike Gilks: "[PATCH 01/12] Fixed checkpatch.pl issues to Line 172 Fixed most problems pointed out by checkpatch.pl in file r8192U_core.c up to line 172"
Previous message: Henrik Rydberg: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] input: Introduce buflock, a one-to-many circularbuffer mechanism"
Next in thread: Mike Gilks: "[PATCH 01/12] Fixed checkpatch.pl issues to Line 172 Fixed most problems pointed out by checkpatch.pl in file r8192U_core.c up to line 172"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Subject:mistakes in previous patches
In-Reply-To:

Please ignore previous patches from this address.
I have made a colossal mess of posting the patches.
I will fix the mess and repost.
My deepest apologies are yours.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Gilks: "[PATCH 01/12] Fixed checkpatch.pl issues to Line 172 Fixed most problems pointed out by checkpatch.pl in file r8192U_core.c up to line 172"
Previous message: Henrik Rydberg: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] input: Introduce buflock, a one-to-many circularbuffer mechanism"
Next in thread: Mike Gilks: "[PATCH 01/12] Fixed checkpatch.pl issues to Line 172 Fixed most problems pointed out by checkpatch.pl in file r8192U_core.c up to line 172"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]