Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Felipe Contreras]

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 20:16:33 +0300
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> New users will see it has low score; they will not install it. That's
>> a network effect.
>>
>> Having users is the quintessential reason people write code.
>
> That is nice. But how does it impact the problem that suspend blockers
> solve? And why do suspend blockers interfere with that?

It doesn't, I don't know why people keep bringing this argument, I
just though it should not be left open as a valid one.

I should have mentioned that this is indeed irrelevant.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/