Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] reduce kvm_lock hold times in mmu_skrink()

[Avi Kivity]

On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> mmu_shrink() is effectively single-threaded since the global
> kvm_lock is held over the entire function.
>
> I beleive its only use here is for synchronization of the
> vm_list.  Instead of using the kvm_lock to ensure
> consistency of the list, we instead obtain a kvm_get_kvm()
> reference.  This keeps the kvm object on the vm_list while
> we shrink it.
>
> Since we don't need the lock to maintain the list any more,
> we can drop it.  We'll reacquire it if we need to get another
> object off.
>
> This leads to a larger number of atomic ops, but reduces
> lock hold times: the typical latency vs. throughput debate.
>
>    

<snip content>

> diff -puN kernel/profile.c~optimize_shrinker-3 kernel/profile.c
> --- linux-2.6.git/kernel/profile.c~optimize_shrinker-3	2010-06-11 09:09:43.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/kernel/profile.c	2010-06-11 09:12:24.000000000 -0700
> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@ void profile_hits(int type, void *__pc,
>   	if (prof_on != type || !prof_buffer)
>   		return;
>   	pc = min((pc - (unsigned long)_stext)>>  prof_shift, prof_len - 1);
> +	if ((pc == prof_len - 1)&&  printk_ratelimit())
> +		printk("profile_hits(%d, %p, %d)\n", type, __pc, nr_hits);
>   	i = primary = (pc&  (NR_PROFILE_GRP - 1))<<  PROFILE_GRPSHIFT;
>   	secondary = (~(pc<<  1)&  (NR_PROFILE_GRP - 1))<<  PROFILE_GRPSHIFT;
>   	cpu = get_cpu();
> _
>    

Unrelated gunk...

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/