Re: [PATCH] d_ino considered harmful

[Valerie Aurora]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:10:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010 20:59:13 Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ static int fillonedir(void * __buf, const char * name, int namlen, loff_t offset
> >  
> >         if (buf->result)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > -       d_ino = ino;
> > +       /* Use of d_ino without st_dev is always buggy. */
> > +       d_ino = 0;
> > +
> >         if (sizeof(d_ino) < sizeof(ino) && d_ino != ino) {
> >                 buf->result = -EOVERFLOW;
> >                 return -EOVERFLOW;
> 
> Isn't this just the path taken by sys_oldreaddir?
> 
> Glibc (at least on my box) translates all user calls to readdir into
> sys_getdents or sys_getdents64, so I think you'd also need to change
> filldir() and filldir64() for your testing.

You're right.  I changed both code paths in the new version, and
actually tested this time.

Thanks,

-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/