Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

[Tejun Heo]

On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> I don't have any problem with that.  I would be almost happy to get
>> your NACK.
> 
> Oh yeah? why is that?

Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
discussion.  So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.

Thanks and have a good night.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/