Re: [PATCH] ptrace: allow restriction of ptrace scope

[James Morris]

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Alan Cox wrote:

> - You can put it together as a security module - which will make people
>   happy and get your stuff upstream. After that you can have a meaningful
>   discussion about stacking

It think this approach is worth pursuing, so that we can also see what's 
there, and determine if there is a need for some form of stacking, or 
whether we can consolidate some of this into library code which the 
various LSMs utilize.

People who don't want to run SELinux / AppArmor / Smack / TOMOYO etc., run 
can still get some protection.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/