Re: intel_cacheinfo: potential NULL dereference?

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 06/22/2010 04:20 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 01:18 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> commit 9350f982 changed the code so it looks like:
>> static ssize_t store_cache_disable(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf,
>>                                    const char *buf, size_t count,
>>                                    unsigned int slot)
>> {
>>         struct pci_dev *dev = this_leaf->l3->dev;   <<1>>
>>         int cpu = cpumask_first(to_cpumask(this_leaf->shared_cpu_map));
>>         unsigned long val = 0;
>>
>> #define SUBCACHE_MASK   (3UL << 20)
>> #define SUBCACHE_INDEX  0xfff
>>
>>         if (!this_leaf->l3 || !this_leaf->l3->can_disable)  <<2>>
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>> Stanse found, that this_leaf->l3 is dereferenced at <<1>>, but checked
>> for being NULL at <<2>>. Is the check superfluous or the dev assignment
>> should go after the check?
> 
> Oh, and I have another report with same symptoms for show_cache_disable.
> 

Looks broken to me, indeed.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/