Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Jun 24 2010 - 07:08:37 EST
> And I really want hardirq context for perf callbacks, some code actually
> relies on it (I used to have the fallback in the timer softirq and that
Surely that could be fixed? *requiring* hard irq context sounds weird.
> broke thing at some point).
I have one case that needs to sleep (but only when interrupting user code)
They key thing in it really is to switch stacks back to process.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/