Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Jun 24 2010 - 07:58:45 EST
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:42:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:20 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Ok so going back to the original self-irq patchkit. Unfortunately the other
> > reviewer hated that. How to get out of that deadlock?
> Well, I didn't like your original patch either.
> What's wrong with going with the patch I posted today? (aside from me
> getting the barriers slightly wrong and not doing the arch
Well it would need to work.
Also I personally didn't see the point of the irq items list because
there's no good way to dynamically allocate it in a NMI, so the window
would be always "fixed size" anyways and you could as well just use
per cpu data.
That's why for simple self irq I preferred Ying's original patch.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/