Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Jun 24 2010 - 09:02:40 EST
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:35:37PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> All of these solutions use the fact that perf events are a generic event
> framework. If there's any missing details somewhere then fixes/enhancements
> can be added - right now our in-kernel event consumers are simple. But the
> design is sound.
One immediate problem that comes to mind with the proposal
is that if the event is of a type that cannot be dropped (e.g. an error
that needs to be handled) then a shared ring buffer cannot guarantee that.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/