Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work -v2
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jun 25 2010 - 18:30:06 EST
> perf has two different reasons to for the callback, what I do is set the
> state and enqueue, if its already enqueued the pending callback will
> handle both.
> Its cheaper than having two callback structures per event.
Again it sounds like you just need a bit...
> We can expose the claim/enqueue thing separately so that users can
Yes it would be good to separate that, because I doubt other users
will require similar hacks.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/