Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work -v2

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Jun 25 2010 - 18:30:06 EST

> perf has two different reasons to for the callback, what I do is set the
> state and enqueue, if its already enqueued the pending callback will
> handle both.
> Its cheaper than having two callback structures per event.

Again it sounds like you just need a bit...
> We can expose the claim/enqueue thing separately so that users can
> choose.

Yes it would be good to separate that, because I doubt other users
will require similar hacks.


ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at