Re: [PATCH] writeback: Fix broken sync writeback
From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Sun Jun 27 2010 - 12:44:49 EST
Hi Jan Kara,
On Monday 2010-02-15 16:41, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>On Monday 2010-02-15 15:49, Jan Kara wrote:
>>On Sat 13-02-10 13:58:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> >> This fixes it by using the passed in page writeback count, instead of
>>> >> doing MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES batches, which gets us much better performance
>>> >> (Jan reports it's up from ~400KB/sec to 10MB/sec) and makes sync(1)
>>> >> finish properly even when new pages are being dirted.
>>> >This seems broken.
>>> It seems so. Jens, Jan Kara, your patch does not entirely fix this.
>>> While there is no sync/fsync to be seen in these traces, I can
>>> tell there's a livelock, without Dirty decreasing at all.
What ultimately became of the discussion and/or the patch?
Your original ad-hoc patch certainly still does its job; had no need to
reboot in 86 days and still counting.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/