kmem_cache_destroy() badness with SLUB
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Sun Jun 27 2010 - 21:49:10 EST
Hi folks !
Internally, I'm hitting a little "nit"...
sysfs_slab_add() has this check:
if (slab_state < SYSFS)
/* Defer until later */
But sysfs_slab_remove() doesn't.
So if the slab is created -and- destroyed at, for example, arch_initcall
time, then we hit a WARN in the kobject code, trying to dispose of a
Now, at first sight, just adding the same test to sysfs_slab_remove()
would do the job... but it all seems very racy to me.
I don't understand in fact how this slab_state deals with races at all.
What prevents us from hitting slab_sysfs_init() at the same time as
another CPU deos sysfs_slab_add() ? How do that deal with collisions
trying to register the same kobject twice ? Similar race with remove...
Shouldn't we have a mutex around those guys ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/