Re: [PATCH/RFC] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B
From: Jean Delvare
Date: Fri Jul 02 2010 - 03:20:35 EST
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:02:15 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> This patch adds support for W83667HG-B to the w83627ehf driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Key relevant difference between W83667HG and W83667HG-B are the Chip ID as well
> as the fan output and step output register addresses. Those differences are
> addressed with this patch.
>
> There are other relevant changes in the mapping of input sensors to fan
> control (W83667HG datasheet chapter 8.7, W83667HG-B datasheet chapter 8.5).
> However, control of those mappings is not implemented in the driver, thus the
> respective changes should not have an impact on driver operation.
>
> Changes made in this patch are based on information from datasheets only. The
> patch has not yet been tested with real hardware. The patch must be tested with
> real hardware before it is integrated, and is thus submitted as RFC.
Thanks for doing this. Quick review:
>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> index 0dcaba9..074e15b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> w83627dhg 9 5 4 3 0xa020 0xc1 0x5ca3
> w83627dhg-p 9 5 4 3 0xb070 0xc1 0x5ca3
> w83667hg 9 5 3 3 0xa510 0xc1 0x5ca3
> + w83667hg-b 9 5 3 3 0xb350 0xc1 0x5ca3
> */
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -55,7 +56,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include "lm75.h"
>
> -enum kinds { w83627ehf, w83627dhg, w83627dhg_p, w83667hg };
> +enum kinds { w83627ehf, w83627dhg, w83627dhg_p, w83667hg, w83667hg_b };
>
> /* used to set data->name = w83627ehf_device_names[data->sio_kind] */
> static const char * w83627ehf_device_names[] = {
> @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ static const char * w83627ehf_device_names[] = {
> "w83627dhg",
> "w83627dhg",
> "w83667hg",
> + "w83667hg-b",
Dashes aren't allowed in hwmon device names. For consistency with what
we did for the W83627DHG-Pg, you should simply drop the "-b". It's a small
detail of little interest for the user anyway.
> };
>
> static unsigned short force_id;
> @@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_id, "Override the detected device ID");
> #define SIO_W83627DHG_ID 0xa020
> #define SIO_W83627DHG_P_ID 0xb070
> #define SIO_W83667HG_ID 0xa510
> +#define SIO_W83667HG_B_ID 0xb350
> #define SIO_ID_MASK 0xFFF0
>
> static inline void
> @@ -201,8 +204,17 @@ static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_TOLERANCE[] = { 0x07, 0x07, 0x14, 0x62 };
> static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_START_OUTPUT[] = { 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x16, 0x65 };
> static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STOP_OUTPUT[] = { 0x08, 0x09, 0x15, 0x64 };
> static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STOP_TIME[] = { 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x17, 0x66 };
> -static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT[] = { 0xff, 0x67, 0xff, 0x69 };
> -static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT[] = { 0xff, 0x68, 0xff, 0x6a };
> +
> +static const u8 *W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT;
> +static const u8 *W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT;
> +
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_COMMON[]
> + = { 0xff, 0x67, 0xff, 0x69 };
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_COMMON[]
> + = { 0xff, 0x68, 0xff, 0x6a };
> +
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_W83667_B[] = { 0x67, 0x69, 0x6b };
> +static const u8 W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_W83667_B[] = { 0x68, 0x6a, 0x6c };
Is it just me or these arrays aren't used anywhere?
I think I would just drop them. The "0xff" are suspicious in the
original arrays, and the size difference between the common and
W83667HG-B cases is tricky. Anyone willing to add support for this
feature will need to read the datasheets anyway, so you don't add any
value by including the register addresses here.
>
> /*
> * Conversions
> @@ -1343,22 +1355,35 @@ static int __devinit w83627ehf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* 627EHG and 627EHF have 10 voltage inputs; 627DHG and 667HG have 9 */
> data->in_num = (sio_data->kind == w83627ehf) ? 10 : 9;
> /* 667HG has 3 pwms */
> - data->pwm_num = (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) ? 3 : 4;
> + data->pwm_num = (sio_data->kind == w83667hg
> + || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) ? 3 : 4;
>
> /* Check temp3 configuration bit for 667HG */
> - if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> + if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
> data->temp3_disable = w83627ehf_read_value(data,
> W83627EHF_REG_TEMP_CONFIG[1]) & 0x01;
> data->in6_skip = !data->temp3_disable;
> }
>
> + if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
> + W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT
> + = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_W83667_B;
> + W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT
> + = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_W83667_B;
> + } else {
> + W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT
> + = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT_COMMON;
> + W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT
> + = W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT_COMMON;
> + }
That's not correct. It would be valid (although totally unexpected) to
have two different chips on the same system. Thus
W83627EHF_REG_FAN_MAX_OUTPUT and W83627EHF_REG_FAN_STEP_OUTPUT
shouldn't be global pointers but per-device pointers. You can simply
add them to the data structure.
But as said above, the easier is probably to just drop them.
> +
> /* Initialize the chip */
> w83627ehf_init_device(data);
>
> data->vrm = vid_which_vrm();
> superio_enter(sio_data->sioreg);
> /* Read VID value */
> - if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> + if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
> /* W83667HG has different pins for VID input and output, so
> we can get the VID input values directly at logical device D
> 0xe3. */
> @@ -1409,7 +1434,7 @@ static int __devinit w83627ehf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> /* fan4 and fan5 share some pins with the GPIO and serial flash */
> - if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg) {
> + if (sio_data->kind == w83667hg || sio_data->kind == w83667hg_b) {
> fan5pin = superio_inb(sio_data->sioreg, 0x27) & 0x20;
> fan4pin = superio_inb(sio_data->sioreg, 0x27) & 0x40;
> } else {
> @@ -1556,6 +1581,7 @@ static int __init w83627ehf_find(int sioaddr, unsigned short *addr,
> static const char __initdata sio_name_W83627DHG[] = "W83627DHG";
> static const char __initdata sio_name_W83627DHG_P[] = "W83627DHG-P";
> static const char __initdata sio_name_W83667HG[] = "W83667HG";
> + static const char __initdata sio_name_W83667HG_B[] = "W83667HG-B";
>
> u16 val;
> const char *sio_name;
> @@ -1588,6 +1614,10 @@ static int __init w83627ehf_find(int sioaddr, unsigned short *addr,
> sio_data->kind = w83667hg;
> sio_name = sio_name_W83667HG;
> break;
> + case SIO_W83667HG_B_ID:
> + sio_data->kind = w83667hg_b;
> + sio_name = sio_name_W83667HG_B;
> + break;
> default:
> if (val != 0xffff)
> pr_debug(DRVNAME ": unsupported chip ID: 0x%04x\n",
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/