[PATCH 17/18] vfs: don't use BKL in default_llseek

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Jul 07 2010 - 17:43:43 EST


There are currently 191 users of default_llseek.
Nine of these are in device drivers that use the
big kernel lock. None of these ever touch
file->f_pos outside of llseek or file_pos_write.

Consequently, we never rely on the BKL
in the default_llseek function and can
replace that with i_mutex, which is also
used in generic_file_llseek.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/read_write.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 9c04852..31c0be7 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
{
loff_t retval;

- lock_kernel();
+ mutex_lock(&file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
switch (origin) {
case SEEK_END:
offset += i_size_read(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
retval = offset;
}
out:
- unlock_kernel();
+ mutex_unlock(&file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_llseek);
--
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/