Re: [patch 134/149] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Jul 13 2010 - 14:15:39 EST


On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, current upstream uses "m":

Yes, I'd expect current 2.6.34 to also show the same problem.

> and works; I also failed to reproduce with 2.6.32.16.  So I expect some
> toolchain involvement.

And yes, I do believe it's likely a newer gcc that triggers it too,
otherwise we'd have seen more reports of it.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/