Re: [PATCH v2] pm: Add runtime PM statistics

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, July 12, 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:26:07 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > +
> > >  static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_usage, 0444, rtpm_usagecount_show,
> > > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_kids, 0444,
> > > rtpm_children_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_status, 0444,
> > > rtpm_status_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_time,
> > > 0444, rtpm_active_time_show, NULL); +static
> > > DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_suspended_time, 0444, rtpm_suspended_time_show,
> > > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_enabled, 0444, rtpm_enabled_show,
> > > NULL);
> > 
> > On a second thought, "active_time" and "suspended_time" should be
> > sufficient (ie. the "runtime_" prefix is not really necessary).
> 
> it's not necessary but it's consistent with the others... so yes
> I can change it but then it's no longer consistent naming.. are you sure
> you want this changed?

No, you're right, sorry.

But can you rebase your patch on top of linux-next, please, and move the
definitions of the new attributes next to 'control' and 'runtime_status' (so
that they don't depend on 'debug')?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/