Re: [PATCH 02/13] AppArmor: basic auditing infrastructure.

[Eric Paris]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Johansen
<john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Update lsm_audit for AppArmor specific data, and add the core routines for
> AppArmor uses for auditing.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> + * Currently AppArmor auditing is fed straight into the audit framework.
> + *
> + * TODO:
> + * convert to LSM audit


TODO?

> +       if (sa->aad.profile) {
> +               struct aa_profile *profile = sa->aad.profile;
> +               pid_t pid;
> +               rcu_read_lock();
> +               pid = tsk->real_parent->pid;
> +               rcu_read_unlock();
> +               audit_log_format(ab, " parent=%d", pid);
> +               audit_log_format(ab, " profile=");
> +               if (profile->ns != root_ns) {
> +                       audit_log_format(ab, ":");
> +                       audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, profile->ns->base.hname);
> +                       audit_log_format(ab, "://");
> +               }
> +               audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, profile->base.hname);
> +       }

what does this message look like?  I don't think it fits the nice
key=value rules of the audit system....   Are you sure this is what
you want?

> +#define COMMON_AUDIT_DATA_INIT_NONE(_d) \
> +       do { \
> +               memset((_d), 0, sizeof(struct common_audit_data)); \
> +               (_d)->type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NONE; \
> +       } while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* __AA_AUDIT_H */

Why are you redefining this?  You should just use
COMMON_AUDIT_DATA_INIT(sa, NONE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/