Re: [AppArmor #5 0/13] AppArmor security module

[John Johansen]

On 07/15/2010 10:21 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> LXR as of 7889ab2 "AppArmor: Drop CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_COMPAT_24"
> is at http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/lxr/source/?v=apparmor-dev .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding apparmorfs.c
> 
>  58 static void kvfree(void *buffer)
>  59 {
>  60         if (!buffer)
>  61                 return;
>  62 
>  63         if (is_vmalloc_addr(buffer))
>  64                 vfree(buffer);
>  65         else
>  66                 kfree(buffer);
>  67 }
> 
> You can omit
> 
> 	if (!buffer)
> 		return;
> 
> (if you want) because is_vmalloc_addr(NULL) is false and kfree(NULL) is no-op.
> 
right, I'll pull that

> 
> 
>  80 static char *aa_simple_write_to_buffer(int op, const char __user *userbuf,
>  81                                        size_t alloc_size, size_t copy_size,
>  82                                        loff_t *pos)
>  83 {
>  84         char *data;
>  85 
>  86         if (*pos != 0) {
>  87                 /* only writes from pos 0, that is complete writes */
> 
> You can
> 
> 	return ERR_PTR(-ESPIPE);
> 
> here.
> 
>  88                 data = ERR_PTR(-ESPIPE);
>  89                 goto out;
>  90         }
>  91 
yep

>  92         /*
>  93          * Don't allow profile load/replace/remove from profiles that don't
>  94          * have CAP_MAC_ADMIN
>  95          */
>  96         if (!aa_may_manage_policy(op))
>  97                 return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
>  98 
>  99         /* freed by caller to simple_write_to_buffer */
> 100         data = kvmalloc(alloc_size);
> 101         if (data == NULL)
> 102                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 103 
> 104         if (copy_from_user(data, userbuf, copy_size)) {
> 105                 kvfree(data);
> 
> You can
> 
> 	return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> 
> here.
> 
yes

> 106                 data = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> 107                 goto out;
> 108         }
> 109 
> 110 out:
> 
> This label will become unused.
> 
consider it done

> 111         return data;
> 112 }
> 
> 
> 
> 188 struct dentry *aa_fs_null;
> 189 struct vfsmount *aa_fs_mnt;
> 
> You can add "static" to these variables and
hrmmm, actually those can be dropped they are part of another patch
that isn't ready for submission yet.

> 
> 
> 
> 232                 aafs_remove("profiles");
> 
> This entry is never created because aafs_create("profiles") is not called.
> 
yes, thanks I missed that one, it needs to go into the compatibility patch.
I'll make another pass through and make sure I have got them all.

> 
> 
> Regarding audit.c
> 
>  98  * convert to LSM audit
> 
> Already converted to LSM audit.
> 
yeah, thanks

> 
> 
> 104 /**
> 105  * audit_base - core AppArmor function.
> 106  * @ab: audit buffer to fill
> 107  * @sa: audit structure containing data to audit
> 108  *
> 109  * Record common AppArmor audit data from @sa
> 110  */
> 111 static void audit_pre(struct audit_buffer *ab, void *ca)
> 
> Needs to sync description.
> 
yep, thanks that is another one I missed, and here I thought I had
gotten them all

> 
> 
> Regarding domain.c
> 
> 630                 if (!hat) {
> 631                         if (!COMPLAIN_MODE(root) || permtest) {
> 632                                 info = "hat not found";
> 633                                 if (list_empty(&root->base.profiles))
> 634                                         error = -ECHILD;
> 635                                 else
> 636                                         error = -ENOENT;
> 637                                 goto out;
> 
> Setting "info" is useless if "goto out" is what you meant.
> 
Right, the info is currently useless.

> 638                         }
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding file.c
> 
>  56         *m++ = '\0';
>
> You don't need "++" here because this is the terminator.
>
yep

 
> 
> 
> 222 /**
> 223  * aa_str_perms - find permission that match @name
> 224  * @dfa: to match against  (NOT NULL)
> 225  * @state: state to start matching in
> 226  * @name: string to match against dfa  (NOT NULL)
> 227  * @cond: conditions to consider for permission set computation  (NOT NULL)
> 228  * @perms: Returns - the permissions found when matching @name
> 229  *
> 230  * Returns: the final state in @dfa when beginning @start and walking @name
> 231  */
> 232 unsigned int aa_str_perms(struct aa_dfa *dfa, unsigned int start,
> 233                           const char *name, struct path_cond *cond,
> 234                           struct file_perms *perms)
> 235 {
> 236         unsigned int state;
> 237         if (!dfa) {
> 
> Comment says dfa != NULL.
> 
hrmmm, the comment is wrong.  This is another place where the comments got out
of sync with the code.

> 238                 *perms = nullperms;
> 239                 return DFA_NOMATCH;
> 240         }
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding ipc.c
> 
>  52 /**
>  53  * aa_may_ptrace - test if tracer task can trace the tracee
>  54  * @tracer_task: task who will do the tracing  (NOT NULL)
>  55  * @tracer: profile of the task doing the tracing  (NOT NULL)
>  56  * @tracee: task to be traced
>  57  * @mode: whether PTRACE_MODE_READ || PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH
>  58  *
>  59  * Returns: %0 else error code if permission denied or error
>  60  */
>  61 int aa_may_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer_task, struct aa_profile *tracer,
>  62                   struct aa_profile *tracee, unsigned int mode)
>  63 {
>  64         /* TODO: currently only based on capability, not extended ptrace
>  65          *       rules,
>  66          *       Test mode for PTRACE_MODE_READ || PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH
>  67          */
>  68 
>  69         if (!tracer || tracer == tracee)
>  70                 return 0;
> 
> Comment says tracer != NULL.
>
comment wrong again :(

> 
> 
> Regarding lib.c
> 
>  65 bool aa_strneq(const char *str, const char *sub, int len)
>  66 {
>  67         int res = strncmp(str, sub, len);
>  68         if (res)
>  69                 return 0;
>  70         if (str[len] == 0)
>  71                 return 1;
>  72         return 0;
>  73 }
> 
> bool aa_strneq(const char *str, const char *sub, int len)
> {
> 	return !strncmp(str, sub, len) && !str[len];
> }
> 
> and move to include/apparmor.h as a "static inline" function?
> 
yes, that is better

> 
> 
>  75 void aa_info_message(const char *str)
>  76 {
>  77         struct common_audit_data sa;
>  78         COMMON_AUDIT_DATA_INIT_NONE(&sa);
>  79         sa.aad.info = str,
>  80         printk(KERN_INFO "AppArmor: %s\n", str);
>  81         if (audit_enabled)
>  82                 aa_audit(AUDIT_APPARMOR_STATUS, NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &sa, NULL);
>  83 }
> 
> void aa_info_message(const char *str)
> {
> 	printk(KERN_INFO "AppArmor: %s\n", str);
> 	if (audit_enabled) {
> 		struct common_audit_data sa;
> 		COMMON_AUDIT_DATA_INIT_NONE(&sa);
> 		sa.aad.info = str;
> 		aa_audit(AUDIT_APPARMOR_STATUS, NULL, GFP_KERNEL, &sa, NULL);
> 	}
> }
> 
> ?
> 
Anything more specific? :)

> 
> 
> Regarding lsm.c
> 
> 134 static int apparmor_capable(struct task_struct *task, const struct cred *cred,
> 135                             int cap, int audit)
> 136 {
> 137         struct aa_profile *profile;
> 138         /* cap_capable returns 0 on success, else -EPERM */
> 139         int error = cap_capable(task, cred, cap, audit);
> 140 
> 141         profile = aa_cred_profile(cred);
> 142         if (!error  && !unconfined(profile))
> 143                 error = aa_capable(task, profile, cap, audit);
> 144 
> 145         return error;
> 146 }
> 
> static int apparmor_capable(struct task_struct *task, const struct cred *cred,
> 			    int cap, int audit)
> {
> 	/* cap_capable returns 0 on success, else -EPERM */
> 	int error = cap_capable(task, cred, cap, audit);
> 
> 	if (!error) {
> 		struct aa_profile *profile;
> 		profile = aa_cred_profile(cred);
> 	  	if (!unconfined(profile))
> 			error = aa_capable(task, profile, cap, audit);
> 	}
> 	return error;
> }
> 
> ?
> 
? 

> 
> 
> 148 static int apparmor_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int sysctl_op)
> 149 {
> 
> I think you can use security_dentry_open() like TOMOYO does.
>
okay, I'll take a look.

> 
> 
> 578 static int apparmor_setprocattr(struct task_struct *task, char *name,
> 579                                 void *value, size_t size)
> 580 {
> 581         char *command, *args;
> 582         size_t arg_size;
> 583         int error;
> 584 
> 585         if (size == 0 || size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> 586                 return -EINVAL;
> 
> If value[PAGE_SIZE - 1] == '\0', I think it is OK to accept size == PAGE_SIZE
> (provided that you skip "args[size] = '\0';" when size == PAGE_SIZE).
hrmm, there is code after that, that relies on their being a trailing '\0',
so if we get rid of that, we will either need to check that their is already
a trailing \0 appended, or modify the code that depends on it.

I'll play with it and see

> Also, size > PAGE_SIZE is always false because proc_pid_attr_write() truncates
> at PAGE_SIZE position.
right, it really was just a check to make sure the value was no bigger than
PAGE_SIZE - 1

> 
> 587 
> 588         /* task can only write its own attributes */
> 589         if (current != task)
> 590                 return -EACCES;
> 591 
> 592         args = value;
> 593         args[size] = '\0';
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding match.c
> 
>  89         tsize = table_size(th.td_lolen, th.td_flags);
>  90         if (bsize < tsize)
>  91                 goto out;
>  92 
>  93         /* freed by free_table */
>  94         if (tize <= (16*PAGE_SIZE))
>  95                 table = kmalloc(table_alloc_size(tsize),
>  96                                 GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN);
>  97         if (!table) {
>  98                 table = vmalloc(tsize);
>  99                 if (table)
> 100                         unmap_alias = 1;
> 101         }
> 
> This is bad when tsize < sizeof(struct work_struct) &&
> kmalloc() failed and vmalloc() succeeded because
> free_table() assumes tsize >= sizeof(struct work_struct) for
> vmalloc()ed memory.
> 
right I made the assumption that a page is bigger than work_struct,
and the code really shouldn't carry those assumptions

> 
> 
> 206 static void dfa_free(struct aa_dfa *dfa)
> 207 {
> 208         if (dfa) {
> 209                 int i;
> 210 
> 211                 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dfa->tables); i++) {
> 212                         free_table(dfa->tables[i]);
> 213                         dfa->tables[i] = NULL;
> 214                 }
> 215         }
> 216         kfree(dfa);
> 
> You can move kfree(dfa); to inside { } because kfree(NULL) is redundant.
> 
yep

> 217 }
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding path.c
> 
> 148 static int get_name_to_buffer(struct path *path, int flags, char *buffer,
> 149                               int size, char **name)
> 150 {
> 151         int adjust = (flags & PATH_IS_DIR) ? 1 : 0;
> 152         int error = d_namespace_path(path, buffer, size - adjust, name, flags);
> 153 
> 154         if (!error && (flags & PATH_IS_DIR) && (*name)[1] != '\0')
> 
> 	if (!error && adjust && (*name)[1] != '\0')
> 
> 
> 
> 219 char *sysctl_pathname(struct ctl_table *table, char *buffer, int buflen)
> 
> This will become unused when apparmor_sysctl() is removed.
> 
yes

> 
> 
> Regarding policy.c
> 
> 622 void aa_free_root_ns(void)
> 
> You can add "__init".
> 
yep, thanks

> 
> 
> Regarding procattr.c
> 
> 113 int aa_setprocattr_changehat(char *args, size_t size, int test)
> 114 {
> 115         char *hat;
> 116         u64 token;
> 117         const char *hats[16];           /* current hard limit on # of names */
> 118         int count = 0;
> 119 
> 120         hat = split_token_from_name(OP_CHANGE_HAT, args, &token);
> 121         if (IS_ERR(hat))
> 122                 return PTR_ERR(hat);
> 123 
> 124         if (!hat && !token) {
> 125                 AA_ERROR("change_hat: Invalid input, NULL hat and NULL magic");
> 126                 return -EINVAL;
> 127         }
> 128 
> 129         if (hat) {
> 130                 /* set up hat name vector, args guarenteed null terminated
> 131                  * at args[size]
> 132                  */
> 133                 char *end = args + size;
> 134                 for (count = 0; (hat < end) && count < 16; ++count) {
> 135                         char *next = hat + strlen(hat) + 1;
> 
> Where was "hat" tokenized by '\0'? It seems that hats[1..15] == NULL.
> 
In the userspace api.  If more than 1 hat is specified they must be separated by \0.

> 136                         hats[count] = hat;
> 137                         hat = next;
> 138                 }
> 139         }
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding include/apparmor.h
> 
>  67 static inline unsigned int aa_dfa_null_transition(struct aa_dfa *dfa,
>  68                                                   unsigned int start)
>  69 {
>  70         return aa_dfa_match_len(dfa, start, "\0", 1);
>  71 }
> 
> You can use "" instead of "\0".
> 
yeah, I actually was doing that at one point, and someone pointed out as
a "bug" so I added that to be explicit.  Probably better as a comment
though.

> 
> 
> Regarding include/policy.h
> 
>  35 #define COMPLAIN_MODE(_profile)                         \
>  36         ((aa_g_profile_mode == APPARMOR_COMPLAIN) || ((_profile) &&     \
>  37                                         (_profile)->mode == APPARMOR_COMPLAIN))
>  38 
>  39 #define DO_KILL(_profile)                                       \
>  40         ((aa_g_profile_mode == APPARMOR_KILL) || ((_profile) && \
>  41                                         (_profile)->mode == APPARMOR_KILL))
>  42 
>  43 #define PROFILE_IS_HAT(_profile) \
>  44         ((_profile) && (_profile)->flags & PFLAG_HAT)
> 
> Do these still need _profile != NULL check?
> 
Hrmm, they shouldn't anymore.  There were a couple cases last I checked, but that was
before I had finished with the conversion, I'll go through and make sure and clean
this up.

> 
> 
> 301 static inline int AUDIT_MODE(struct aa_profile *profile)
> 302 {
> 303         if (aa_g_audit != AUDIT_NORMAL)
> 304                 return aa_g_audit;
> 305         if (profile)
> 306                 return profile->audit;
> 307         return AUDIT_NORMAL;
> 308 }
> 
> Can profile == NULL happen?

yes actually.  There are couple places that call into the audit code with
profile == NULL to log a message not associated with a profile.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/