Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:50:47PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
>
> This patch series contains some cleanups and reworks I made during
> code review and feature implementation for upcoming cpus.
> 
> Most patches refactor the xsave initialization that is very dependent
> on fpu initialization. This series starts to decouple this a little
> bit as xsave not only supports fpu features. Also this is an attempt
> to ease the xsave interface by making some of the functions and
> variables static.
> 
> There is also one patch that removes boot_cpu_id variable, which is
> not really related to xsave. Maybe this should be applied to another
> branch.
> 
> The patches are relative to today's tip/x86/xsave branch.
> 
> (The patches are small for better review and rebasing.)
> 
> -Robert
> 

Hi Robert, I recall there was a thread related to boot_cpu_id and
cpu = 0. Unfortunately I can't find it neither in my mbox nor somewhere
in net at moment. Ie technically speaking -- yes boot_cpu_id will be 0
but perhaps instead of magic !cpu and friends explicit boot_cpu_id might
be better for code reading. It might be is_boot_cpu() macro helper or
so as well.

Though I don't have strong opinion but for ones who will be
reading the code first time it might be confusing :) Agreed?

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/