Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks

[Robert Richter]

On 21.07.10 13:17:18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > 
> > > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only,
> > > just to not break other's patch queues.
> > > 
> > 
> > Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the
> > *next* merge window.
> > 
> > 	-hpa
> >
> 
> ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment
> instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose.

Yes, I am just using:

if (!smp_processor_id())
	...

Cyrill, if you like, I will leave it up to you to introduce the
is_boot_cpu() macro.

I still have patch 7/7 in my new posting in that removes the
boot_cpu_id. If your patch comes soon this will be obsolete as all
places will have the macro then.

Thanks,

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/