Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: cma: Contiguous Memory Allocator added

[MichaÅ Nazarewicz]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:45:43 +0200, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Your not hearing the issues.. IT'S TOO COMPLEX! Please remove it.

Remove what exactly?

The command line parameter? It's like 50 lines of code, so I don't
see any benefits.

The possibility to specify the configuration? It would defy the whole
purpose of CMA, so I won't do that.

The complexity has to be there one way or the other and even though
I am aware that less complex code is the better and am trying to
remove unnecessary complexity but saying âremove itâ won't make any
good unless you provide me with a better alternative.  At this point,
I am still convinced that the string parameters are the best option.

--
Best regards,                                        _     _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of  o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science,  MichaÅ "mina86" Nazarewicz       (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/