Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the wirelesstree

[mark gross]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 01:20:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the suspend tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c between commit
> d267be307a3345ef06889511cad2aa1fecc83db7 ("ipw2100: mark
> ipw2100_pm_qos_req static") from the wireless tree and commit
> 82f682514a5df89ffb3890627eebf0897b7a84ec ("pm_qos: Get rid of the
> allocation in pm_qos_add_request()") from the suspend tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> index 5bbff4c,7f0d98b..0000000
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2100.c
> @@@ -174,7 -174,7 +174,7 @@@ that only one external action is invoke
>   #define DRV_DESCRIPTION	"Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Driver"
>   #define DRV_COPYRIGHT	"Copyright(c) 2003-2006 Intel Corporation"
>   
> - static struct pm_qos_request_list *ipw2100_pm_qos_req;
>  -struct pm_qos_request_list ipw2100_pm_qos_req;
> ++static struct pm_qos_request_list ipw2100_pm_qos_req

It should be static.  Thanks
--mgross

>   
>   /* Debugging stuff */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_IPW2100_DEBUG
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/