Re: [PATCHv6 0/9] kill unnecessary SB sync wake-ups + cleanups

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 15:14 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> here is v6 of my SB sync wakups killing patches, v5 may be found:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127583599911620&w=2
> 
> This is more of a reminder re-send, I did not get any feed-back for
> v5. Not much changes since v5:
> 
> 1. Drop patches which fix race conditions for s_dirty changes WRT actual
>    write-back - these things are independent and I am planning to go through
>    that separately.
> 2. Add "Acked-by" to the btrfs patch.
> 3. Fold all per-fs patches which introduce SB accessors into one big patch.

Hi Al,

you "unofficially" told me that you want to get rid of '->write_super()'
and 'sync_supers()' should not exist. And FSes which really need
'->write_super()' should implement that themselves.

I will try to work on this, but a bit later, after my holidays. But
could you please:

1. confirm that you want to kill '->write_super()' and '->s_dirt'
   "officially", so that I could refer to this when sending patches

2. pick up patches 1-6 from this series, this would make my life easier
   a bit.

I'm not sure then what do do with:

commit 140236b4b1c749c9b795ea3d11558a0eb5a3a080
Author: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jun 10 13:56:33 2010 +0300

    VFS: introduce s_dirty accessors

which Linus merged, but which is now not needed, since you now want me
to kill '->write_super()' completely. Will you take care of this please?

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/