Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: don't allow aliased requests to starve others

[Jeff Moyer]

Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 07/24/2010 10:04 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 14.07.2010, Jeff Moyer wrote: 
>> 
>>> Comments, as always, are welcome.
>> 
>> This patch, applied to 2.6.35-rc6, increases desktop interactivity
>> _NOTICEABLY_ on my quadcore machine, and the machine stays rock-stable.
>> I have now tested this patch with the latest 2.6.35-rc kernels over 
>> 1 week.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, I can't provide some testing results which makes this
>> statement more objective, but I'll do some synthetic testing in the next
>> days.
>
> It is extremely unlikely that this patch will have any impact on
> "normal" workloads. To even hit a code path where it would make a
> difference, you would need to use O_DIRECT IO, otherwise you cannot have
> aliases in the IO scheduler.

I agree that it shouldn't help normal workloads at all.  I do think
there is one other case where you can get aliases: doing I/O both
through the file system and the underlying device.  However, that's
obviously a bad idea (and maybe open_bdev_exclusive will keep that from
happening?).

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/