Re: [PATCH 31/31] memblock: Add memblock_find_in_range()

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 07/28/2010 12:12 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> the problem is later if the user hit the problem, it will be called "Regression" after bisecting to the memblock/x86 changes.
> because low/high does work before.
> 
> BTW, that design from qlogic to save log in RAM is not good one, they may save some cents for the ram in card.
> 
> other vendors seems put log/trace in the ram on card.
> 

It's broken NOW.  The only reason it's not exploding is by accident.
The fact that you knew about the problem and had the notion of working
around it instead of fixing the root cause by either fixing or
blacklisting the broken driver is disgusting beyond belief.

Either the driver needs to map the memory off limit in the e820 map
passed to kexec, or better yet it should have its DMA disabled across
kexec.  I'm truly appalled.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/