[PATCH v2 0/4] timer: Added usleep[_range] timer

From: Patrick Pannuto
Date: Wed Jul 28 2010 - 15:33:51 EST


After writing both documentation and a checkpatch rule explaining
why the usleep API should never be used, it occurred to me that
perhaps such an API should never be added :) - at least not in its
previous form.

This iteration is similar, with the notable difference that now
usleep has a "built-in slack" of 200%. This is analogous to msleep,
which has a built-in slack of 0.4% (since it relies on legacy timers,
which have a built-in slack of 0.4%). 200% slack is significantly
greater than 0.4%, but the scale of usleep is also significantly
different than that of msleep, and I believe 200% to be a sane
default.

It is my opinion that this interface will most often mirror what
developers actually intend - indeed some people who have begun
trying to use the API raised this point -, however, I would like
some input as it is possibly confusing that the API will "double
your sleep" by default.

The usleep_range API is still included, since it provides an
interface to override the "default slack" of 200% by providing
an explicit range, or to allow callers to specify an even larger
slack if possible.


This patch series is NOT based off of tip (read: it will conflict
with the previous usleep patch in -mm) since it is slighly
different, and Andrew Morton lamented to loss of the detailed
changelog info in the previous iteration - it is included here.

This series also includes the "full set", that is
1: Adds the usleep[_range] API
2: Adds timers-howto documentation
3: Checkpatch: prefer usleep over udelay
4: Checkpatch: warn about unexpectedly long msleep's


*** Changes in v2
* Add "default slack" to usleep
* Fix missing usec->nsec for delta in do_usleep_range
* Fix Documentation typos
* Better checkpatch regex's

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/