Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: extend cpuidle and menu governor to handledynamic states

[Ai Li]

On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:15:29 -0600
> Ai Li <aili@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 11:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > I'd be reluctant to merge this code without also having code which uses
> > > it.  As it is the change is useless and untestable.
> > 
> > We have local code in the arch/arm/mach-msm branch that uses the new
> > cpuidle code.  We are still developing and testing the MSM patches, and
> > hope to upstream them in a few weeks.
> > 
> 
> grumble.
> 
> Well, please at least explain all this in the changelogs when you send
> out the next version.

Sure.  Or ...

On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 13:15 -0600, Ai Li wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 11:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > I'd be reluctant to merge this code without also having code which uses
> > > it.  As it is the change is useless and untestable.
> > 
> > We have local code in the arch/arm/mach-msm branch that uses the new
> > cpuidle code.  We are still developing and testing the MSM patches, and
> > hope to upstream them in a few weeks.
> 
> We can just re-submit this patch with our msm cpuidle code when that is
> finished.

If the consensus is that this is the better way, I can resubmit at the later
time.  I'll send out a new version of the patch this week so to incorporate
Andrew's comments.

~Ai

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/