Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: enlarge iotlb buffer on demand

From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Sat Jul 31 2010 - 23:07:57 EST


On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:07:06 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I took your patch and was trying to fit it over the
> stable/swiotlb-0.8.4 branch and when I did so a found couple of things..
>
>
> > > @@ -215,14 +222,14 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> > > bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>
> You should also initialize the __io_tlb_start array first:

Yeah, I know. As I wrote, this patchset breaks IA64.

I really merge to swiotlb's two memory allocator mechanisms
(swiotlb_init_with_default_size and
swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size). I need to look at the x86 memory
boot code after memblock surgery finishes.

And as you know, I've not fixed the error path and swiotlb_free. I'll
do later if people are not against swiotlb dynamic allocation.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/