Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ commandcompletion update
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 00:23:47 EST
On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
So, something like this. I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.
Are you planning on applying the second patch too?
sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081
chip, embedded in a Dell server box. Looking into it...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/