Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Matthew Garrett]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:32:16AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> If this doesn't work for the Android folks for whatever reason, another
> approach would be to do the freeze in user code, which could track
> whether any user-level resources (pthread mutexes, SysV semas, whatever)
> where held, and do the freeze on a thread-by-thread basis within each
> "victim" application as the threads reach safe points.

The main problem I see with the cgroups solution is that it doesn't seem 
to do anything to handle avoiding loss of wakeup events.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/