Re: [PATCH 0/2] Adding four writeback files in /proc/sys/vm

From: Michael Rubin
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 20:19:17 EST

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For pages_dirtied and pages_entered_writeback: it's hard to see how any
> reimplementation of writeback would have any problem implementing
> these, so OK.

> But dirty_threshold_kbytes and dirty_background_threshold_kbytes are
> closely tied to the implementation-of-the-day and so I don't think they
> should be presented in /proc.

OK I will resend patch without threshold and then look for the write
place in debugfs to put them in a subsequent patch.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at