Re: [rfc] Merge kexec-tools into the kernel tree
From: AmÃrico Wang
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 23:22:57 EST
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:19:46AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> If we talk about analyzing and filtering crash dumps, I can totally
>> see an argument for putting something under tools/ if the authors of
>> mkdumpfile and crash are interested. Those tools fundamentally really
>> do follow kernel internals.
>I agree that the argument is stronger for tools/ inclusion if internal
>APIs need to be followed. Of course perf doesn't need internals APIs
>and it's in tools/.
Well, I don't remember clearly why perf was proposed to be included into
kernel tree by Ingo, I think it was internal API/ABI issue as well.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/