Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu Aug 05 2010 - 02:25:40 EST

On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
> > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the
> > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
> > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation
> > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
> > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
> Applied to
> git://
> Please carry out any further development against the above tree.
> Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest
> version of path_truncate:

Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least
drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some

(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at