Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Matthew Garrett]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:02:28PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:

> Which makes the driver and/or network stack changes identical to using
> wakelocks, right?

I think we're resigned to the fact that we need to indicate wakeup 
events in a manner that's pretty equivalent to wakelocks. The only real 
issue is what the API looks like. Anyone who's still talking about 
cgroups seems to be trying to solve a different problem.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/