Re: [RFC 0/2] apic: tracing IPI events
From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Fri Aug 06 2010 - 07:46:51 EST
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:26:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > please let me know what you think
> You forgot to state why you want it?
> In generall the only case that should happen anytime commonly is mask,
> the others only for obscure uncommon paths.
> However there is already accounting for it in /proc/interrupts
> that can be easily sampled. Does adding additional tracing really give
> any value?
As I was asked to do that for other guys, I'm not completely sure.
Anyway the reason I got was, that while debuging crash it seemed
some IPIs might got lost.
Also it'd be probably used as a tracepoint itself via additional code,
than by ring buffer tracing.
I'll check if I can get more justifing info..
> ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/