Re: [PATCH 3/3] lib: vsprintf: added a put_dec() test and benchmark tool
From: Raja R Harinath
Date: Fri Aug 06 2010 - 11:58:15 EST
MichaÅ Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:10:06 +0200, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Friday 06 August 2010 00:38, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>>> This commit adds a test application for the put_dec() and
>>> family of functions that are used by the previous two commits.
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +put-dec-test: put-dec-test.c
>>> + exec $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
>> (1) Why exec?
> Micro Makefile optimisation -- saves us a fork().
I don't think it's worth it. The use of 'exec' will force make to
invoke the shell, while without the exec, make has an opportunity to
optimize out the shell invocation completely . Forcing the use of a
shell to avoid a fork() sounds like a terrible trade-off.
 See, for instance, construct_command_argv_internal() in
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/