Re: [PATCH 01/18] char: moxa: call disable_pci_device() ifpci_probe() failed

From: Vasiliy Kulikov
Date: Sat Aug 07 2010 - 04:55:56 EST


On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:22 +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:49:10PM +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > Driver should call disable_pci_device() if it returns from pci_probe()
> > with error. Also it must not be called if pci_request_region() fails as
> > it means that somebody uses device resources and rules the device.
> >
>
> I think we should disable it actually. The comments on
> pci_enable_device() and pci_disable_device() say that only the first and
> last callers actually enable and disable it. The others just increment
> or decrement a counter.

See this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/13/82

Specifically this mail:

Date Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:51:26 -0500
From Jeff Garzik <>

...
You also need to consider situations such as out-of-tree drivers
for the same hardware (might not use PCI API), and situations where you
have peer devices discovered and used (PCI API doesn't have "hey, <this>
device is associated with <current driver>, too" capability).
...

Searching for 'pci_disable_device() inurl:lkml' doesn't give me newer info
aboud this problem, so I think it's better to play safe.


>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > Move pci_enable_device() after checking moxa_boards[] to remove senseless
> > pci_enable_device()/pci_disable_device().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/moxa.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/moxa.c b/drivers/char/moxa.c
> > index 107b0bd..0ea5aeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/moxa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/moxa.c
> > @@ -939,11 +939,6 @@ static int __devinit moxa_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > int board_type = ent->driver_data;
> > int retval;
> >
> > - retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > - if (retval) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't enable pci device\n");
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < MAX_BOARDS; i++)
> > if (moxa_boards[i].basemem == NULL)
> > @@ -956,6 +951,12 @@ static int __devinit moxa_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > + if (retval) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't enable pci device\n");
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > board = &moxa_boards[i];
> >
> > retval = pci_request_region(pdev, 2, "moxa-base");
> > @@ -1001,6 +1002,7 @@ err_base:
> > board->basemem = NULL;
> > err_reg:
> > pci_release_region(pdev, 2);
> > + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > err:
> > return retval;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/