Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdogand touch_softlockup_watchdog

From: Don Zickus
Date: Mon Aug 16 2010 - 10:31:50 EST


cc'ing Frederic

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:08:29PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Fix: acpi_os_stall calls touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog
> with preemption enabled causing 'BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
> code'.
>
> Patch also removes double smp_processor_id call (smp_processor_id itself and in
> __get_cpu_var) in __touch_watchdog.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 613bc1f..8822f1e 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -116,13 +116,14 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
> static void __touch_watchdog(void)
> {
> int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -
> - __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> + per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> }
>
> void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> - __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = 0;
> + int this_cpu = get_cpu();
> + per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu) = 0;
> + put_cpu();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
>
> @@ -142,7 +143,9 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
> {
> - __get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) = true;
> + int this_cpu = get_cpu();
> + per_cpu(watchdog_nmi_touch, this_cpu) = true;
> + put_cpu();
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/