Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

[Matthew Garrett]

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> they tend to go "off".
> 
> however I think you're making an assumption that there is a
> real difference between a deep idle state and "off"....
> 
> For modern x86 hardware, that assumption isn't really valid.
> (other than a very very small sram that stores register content in the
> idle case)

Really? I thought the TSC stopped in suspend. Does having a package go 
into C6 mean that the RAM goes into self-refresh?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/