RE: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h

[Gopinath, Thara]

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:29 PM
>>To: Gopinath, Thara
>>Cc: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki); Samuel Ortiz; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tony Lindgren; Andrew Morton
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h
>>
>>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:32:57AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote:
>>>R_PROTECT_KEY offset is 0xE where as the new TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY
>>>is defined as 0xd. I have not checked the trm to see which is correct. But
>>
>>you can use either 0xc0|0x0c or 0xce|0xec, both will work are unlock
>>keys.

No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset
for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe.
Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe.

Regards
Thara
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/