linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with Linus' tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Aug 18 2010 - 21:00:51 EST


Hi Paul,

Today's linux-next merge of the sh tree got a conflict in
arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c between commit
d7627467b7a8dd6944885290a03a07ceb28c10eb ("Make do_execve() take a const
filename pointer") from Linus' tree and commit
d5b7fb7bb8a014ee96cd39b410fc57a7dc239a91 ("sh: fix up fallout from
syscall arg constification") from the sh tree.

I used the version from Linus' tree as it was more complete.

I also applied this merge fixup patch to make the header file prototype
match:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:56:12 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sh: fix prototype of sys_execve to match the new one

Commit d7627467b7 ("Make do_execve() take a const filename pointer")
missed some.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sh/include/asm/syscalls_32.h | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/syscalls_32.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/syscalls_32.h
index be201fd..6089a4e 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/syscalls_32.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/syscalls_32.h
@@ -19,9 +19,10 @@ asmlinkage int sys_clone(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long newsp,
asmlinkage int sys_vfork(unsigned long r4, unsigned long r5,
unsigned long r6, unsigned long r7,
struct pt_regs __regs);
-asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *ufilename, char __user * __user *uargv,
- char __user * __user *uenvp, unsigned long r7,
- struct pt_regs __regs);
+asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *ufilename,
+ const char __user * const __user *uargv,
+ const char __user * const __user *uenvp,
+ unsigned long r7, struct pt_regs __regs);
asmlinkage int sys_sigsuspend(old_sigset_t mask, unsigned long r5,
unsigned long r6, unsigned long r7,
struct pt_regs __regs);
--
1.7.1

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/