RE: Dead Config Option STMMAC_ETH?

[Peppe CAVALLARO]

Hi Christian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Dietrich [mailto:qy03fugy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 10:42 AM
> To: Peppe CAVALLARO
> Cc: Christian Dietrich; David S. Miller; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vamos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Dead Config Option STMMAC_ETH?
> 
> Peppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > There is effort on this driver: currently the driver fully works on
> > STM platforms and starts working on ARM (SPEAr Kernels).  The driver
> > Kconfig actually depends on the CPU_SUBTYPE_ST40 but it built on x86
> > if remove this dependency (just verified).  In the past, I added this
> > dependency because the driver was initially tested on ST kernels
> > (where we continue to have the CPU_SUBTYPE_ST40) but I can review it
> > if you like.
> 
> Hm, i think it would be good if this dependency is removed, if it isn't
> needed, because then a allyes config would compile test this peace of
> code, and it can't die silently with changes around it.

No problem. I'll remove it and review the Kconfig asap.

Peppe

> 
> greetz didi
> --
> (Î x . x x) (Î x . x x) -- See how beatiful the lambda is
> No documentation is better than bad documentation
> -- Das Ausdrucken dieser Mail wird urheberrechtlich verfolgt.
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_